What is the Calm Waters Metaphor? Essay

Until recently the calm waters illustration dominated the thinking of practicing managers and academics. The prevailing ensample for handling qualifying in calm waters is best illustrated in Kurt Lewins three step description of the pitch process. According to Lewin, successful deepen requires unfreezing the status quo, changing to a new sate, and freezing the new change to make it permanent. The status quo fuck be considered an equilibrium state. Unfreezing is necessary to move from this equilibrium. It bed be achieved in one of three ways 1) The driving forces, which direct behavior away from the status quo, can be increased.2) The restraining forces, which hinder movement from the exist equilibrium, can be decreased.3) The two approaches can be combined. Exhibit The change ProcessUnfreezingChangingRefreezingOnce unfreezing has been accomplished the change itself can be use . However, the mere introduction of change does not ensure that it take hold. The new situation, in that locationfore, needs to be refrozen so that it can be sustained over time. Unless this lowest step is attended to, it is likely that the change will be short lived and employees will revert to the previous equilibrium state. The objective of refreezing the entire equilibrium state, then, is to stabilise the new situation by balancing the driving and restraining forces. Note how Lewins three step process treats change as a break in the organizations equilibrium state. The status quo has been distributed, and change is necessary to establish a new equilibrium state.This view might energise been appropriate to the relatively calm waters metaphor is increasingly obsolete as a description of the kinds of seas that current managers have to navigate. How does the White Water rapids Metaphor of change functions?This metaphor takes into consideration the fact environments are both uncertain and dynamic. To beat a feeling for what managing change might be like when you have to contin ually mastermind in uninterrupted rapids, imagine attending a college in which courses vary in length so when you sign up, you dont know whether a course will last for 2 weeks or 30 weeks. Furtherto a greater extent, the instructor can end a course any time heor she wants, with no prior warning. If that isnt bad enough the length of the class session changes each time somemultiplication it lasts 20 minutes, other times it runs for 3 hours and the time of the next class meeting is set by the instructor during the previous class. Oh yes, there is one more thing.The exams are all unannounced, so you have to be ready for a test at any time. To succeed in this college, you would have to be incredibly flexible and be able to serve quickly to every changing condition. Students who are too structured or slow on their feet would not survive. A growing number of managers are feeler to accept that their job is much like what a student would face in such a college. The stability and predict ability of the claim waters do not exist. Disruptions in the status quo are not occasional and temporary, to be followed by a return to calm waters. Many of todays managers never get out of the rapids. They face constant change, bordering on chaos. These managers are being forced to play a game they have never played before, which is governed by rules created as the game progresses. Is the white water rapids metaphor merely an overstatement?No, take the case of General Motors. In the intensely competitive automotive manufacturing business, a high society has to be prepared for any possibility. Cars are being surpassed by sport utility vehicles. Gasoline engines still cause fury among environmentalists who desire a more environment friendly source of power for vehicles. Government regulators demand ever increasing gasoline mileage. Customers want new and unique styles more frequently and challenger in the industry is fierce. Although General Motors has typically on big competitors new entrants into the marketplace Kia and Scion pick away at market share. For General Motors to succeed, it must change and continuously improve and revamp everything that it does.AnswerThe calm waters view of organizational change envisions the organization as a large ship crossover voter a calm sea. The ships captain and crew know exactly where they are going because they have made the trip many times before. Change comes in the form of an occasional storm, a brief distraction in an otherwise calm and predictable trip. In the calm waters metaphor, change is seen as an occasional breach in the normal flow of events.It is best illustrated by Kurt Lewins 3-step description of the change process.According to Lewin, successful change can be planned and requires unfreezing the status quo, changing to a new state, and refreezing to make the change permanent. The status quo can be considered an equilibrium state. To move from this equilibrium, unfreezing is necessary. Unfreezing can b e thought of as preparing for the needed change. It can be achieved by increasing the driving forces, which are forces pushing for change by decreasing the restraining forces, which are forces that wear change and push behavior toward the status quo or by combining the two approaches.Once unfreezing is done, the change itself can be implemented. However, merely introducing change does not ensure that it will take hold. The new situation needs to be refrozen so that it can be sustained over time. Unless this last step is done, there is a strong chance that employees will revert back to the old ways of doing things. The objective of refreezing, then, is to stabilize the new situation by reinforcing the new behaviors.Lewins 3-step process treats change as a move away from the organizations current equilibrium state. It is a calm waters scenario where an occasional disruption means changing to deal with the disruption. Once the disruption has been dealt with, however, things can contin ue on under the new changed situation.